|
Complaint Number |
Parish or CYC Cllr |
Complainant |
Date of Complaint |
Nature of the complaint |
Progress of Complaint |
Resolution |
Resolution completed |
|
2025/05 |
CYC |
Anonymous |
17/06/25 |
The complainant alleges that the Councillor used inappropriate language when communicating via email.
|
The complaint was assessed in accordance with the published procedure for handling Code of Conduct complaints, and a decision was made to take no further action. This is because whilst the email forwarded to the Council officer is critical of Council employees, a certain level of criticism is allowed under the Code as part of a Councillor’s role. Parties notified, complaint closed.
|
N/A |
N/A |
|
2025/09 |
CYC |
York resident |
18/09/2025 |
The complainant alleges that the Councillor has not responded to them on multiple occasions. |
The complaint was assessed in accordance with the published procedure for handling Code of Conduct complaints, and a decision was made to take no further action. This is because a delay/failure to respond is not of itself capable of amounting to disrespect, or of bringing the role or Authority into disrepute and therefore does not constitute a breach of the code. Parties notified, complaint closed.
|
N/A |
N/A |
|
2025/10 |
Parish |
York resident |
24/09/2025 |
The complainant alleges that the Councillor acted in an unprofessional manner in relation to a comment on social media.
|
The Deputy Monitoring Officer reached the conclusion that this matter is outside of the scope of the code of conduct. This is because the subject member was not acting in their capacity as a Parish Councillor when the alleged breach occurred. There was no reference in the comment or on the Councillor’s social media profile to their role as a Parish Councillor, and the post made was not in relation to any duty they may have as a Councillor. Parties notified, complaint closed.
|
N/A |
N/A |
|
2025/11 |
CYC |
Resident |
07/10/2025 |
The complainant alleges the Councillor did not declare an interests regarding a planning application and was not impartial |
In considering the matter all parties were in agreement that minuting the Councillor's confirmation of his address at the meeting, could have provided reassurance about the maintenance of openness. Accordingly, it is recommended that these matters are recorded at future Parish Council meetings. It was recommended the Clerk and Parish Council undertake refresher Code of Conduct Training. |
|
|
|
2025/12 |
CYC |
Resident |
12/11/2025 |
The complainant alleged that Councillors have not responded to email correspondence they have received, and in not doing so breached the Code of Conduct. |
The complaint was assessed in accordance with the published procedure for handling Code of Conduct complaints, and a decision was made to take no further action. This is because a delay/failure to respond is not of itself capable of amounting to disrespect, or of bringing the role or Authority into disrepute and therefore does not constitute a breach of the code. Parties notified, complaint closed. No further action.
|
N/A |
N/A |
|
2025/13 |
CYC |
Resident |
15/12/2025
Closed 26/01/2026 |
Complainant alleged the Councillor had breached the Councillors’ Code of Conduct. In multiple public comments made on a Facebook group he has failed to meet the standards of respect, integrity, honesty, and proper use of position expected of an elected member.
|
IP views sought and Chair of the Joint Standards Committee.
An informal resolution sought. |
A letter of advice sent to the Councillor, with the recommendation of further training. |
Training Completed |
|
2025/07 |
CYC |
5 x residents
|
17/08/25
Closed 22/01/2026 |
The complainants allege the Councillor posted an abusive message on ‘X’, and therefore breached paragraphs 3.1, 3.3 and 3.7 of the code of conduct. |
This complaint was assessed in consultation with the Chair. The Vice chair recused following a declared personal interest. The IP identified a breach of the Code and recommended referral for investigation. DMO initial assessment noted clearly abusive content but no evidence of alleged homophobia. Also noted the message was removed within hours and an apology already independently volunteered. recommendation for additional |
Informal Resolution: training regarding social media use |
Training offered. |
|
2025/08 |
CYC
|
Resident |
28/08/25
Closed 22/01/2026 |
The complainant alleges the Councillor sent unprofessional and inappropriate correspondence via email. The complainant also alleges the correspondence was dismissive and bring the council into disrepute.
|
This complaint was assessed in consultation with the Chair and Vice Chair. The IP recommended no further action. DMO initial assessment was that the content of the emails was not disrespectful nor bringing CYC into disrepute and, although suggestive, did not go as far as to admit or promote criminal behaviour. As there was no evidence of a Code breach, no further action would be taken and the matter closed. |
N/A |
N/A |
|
2026/01 |
CYC |
Resident |
06/01/2026
Closed 22/01/2026 |
The complainant refers to the conduct of a Councillor in in relation to a planning application. |
As the subject member was a member of the Council’s Executive the matter was referred to a meeting of the Joint Standards Sub Committee.
The Sub Committee met and resolved that the matter wasn't in scope and no further action was required. |
N/A |
N/A |
|
2026/06 |
CYC |
Resident |
25/02/26
Closed 05/03/26
|
The complaint relates to the Cllr breaching the code of conduct and abusing their position, with failure to follow due process.
|
This complaint was assessed by the DMO and the IP
After careful consideration it did not pass the gateway test for a code of conduct issue.
|
N/A |
N/A |
|
2026/03 |
CYC |
Resident
|
05/02/26
Closed |
The complainant refers to the code of conduct of the Cllr in relation to press releases about the recent senior officer redundancy case. |
The matter was considered by the Joint Standards Assessment Sub- Committee.
|
The Sub Committee resolved to issue an Advisory Note to the complainant and the subject member, and Group leaders reminding them of the need to always treat members with respect. |
Advisory note sent and taken to Group Leaders. |
|
2026/04 |
CYC |
Resident |
13/02/26
Closed |
The complaint relates to specific conduct by a member of the Executive. |
As the complainant was a member of the Council’s Executive the matter was referred to a meeting of the Joint Standards Sub Committee.
The Sub Committee met and resolved that the matter was not in scope and no further action was required.
|
N/A |
N/A |
|
2026/05 |
Parish |
Public
|
25/02/26
Closed 05/03/26
|
The complaint relates to the Cllr breaching the code of conduct and abusing their position. |
This complaint was assessed by the Deputy Monitoring Officer and IP views were sought. After careful consideration it did not pass the gateway test for a code of conduct issue. |
N/A |
N/A |
|
2026/07 |
CYC |
Public |
09/03/26
Closed |
Related to community posts on social media, misuse of their position as a Cllr. |
This complaint was assessed by the Deputy Monitoring Officer and IP views were sought. Posts were in relation to the member’s work as a ward / parish Cllr, no further action. |
N/A |
N/A |
|
2026/08 |
Parish |
Public |
16/04/2026
Closed 20/04/26 |
The complaint relates to the Cllr breaching the code of conduct.
|
This complaint was assessed by the Deputy Monitoring Officer.
The Cllr was not acting in his role as a Parish Councillor when the alleged incidents took place, therefore the code of conduct is not engaged.
No action taken |
N/A |
N/A |